The bar chart shows the comparison of the reasons why people went to the British Library from 1991 to 2000. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and making comparisons where relevant.
Sample Response 1
The provided bar graph compares the primary reasons for people visiting libraries in Britain during two specific years – 1991 and 2000. A quick glance reveals that there were only four consistent reasons for people visiting the library in both years: borrowing or returning books, obtaining information, studying, and reading newspapers or magazines.
Among these reasons, borrowing or returning books was the most prominent in both years. In 1991, approximately 65% of library visitors came for this purpose, while in 2000, the percentage dropped to 55%.
In contrast, the percentage of people visiting the library to obtain information in 1991 was twice as high as in 2000, with figures of around 20% in 1991 and roughly 10% in 2000. The percentage of those studying at the library also decreased significantly, from around 10% in 1991 to nearly 2% in 2000. Notably, the proportion of people reading newspapers or magazines in 1991 was three times greater than in 2000.
Sample Response 2
The bar charts provide a comparison of the primary reasons why British people visited public libraries in 1991 and 2000.
In general, the majority of British citizens, approximately 65% in 1991 and 55% in 2000, frequented government-funded libraries to borrow or return books.
In 1991, 10% of British individuals sought information at public libraries, while this figure doubled to 20% in 2000. Conversely, the number of people spending time reading newspapers or magazines in public libraries in 2000 was twice as high as in 1991.
The percentage of British citizens studying in government-funded libraries experienced a significant decline, dropping from 10% in 1991 to just 2% in 2000. This shift may be attributed to the substantial increase in the proportion of people using the library for the purpose of borrowing and returning videos. Specifically, in 2000, as many as 18% of British people visited public libraries for video-related purposes, while this category was non-existent in 1991.
Sample response 3
The graph compares the percentages of the primary reasons for people visiting libraries in Britain in two specific years, 1991 and 2000. These reasons include borrowing or returning books, obtaining information, studying, reading newspapers or magazines, and borrowing or returning videos.
In general, there were four primary reasons for visiting the library in 1991. However, in 2000, a new function was introduced: borrowing and returning videos. Despite this addition, the primary purpose of visiting the library remained consistent in both years, which was to borrow or return books. Studying at the library was the least common reason for people to visit.
The percentage of people visiting the library to borrow or return books decreased slightly from 65% in 1991 to 55% in 2000. In contrast, the percentage of those seeking to obtain information doubled in 2000 compared to 1991 (20% versus 10%). The percentage of people using the library for studying also declined significantly, dropping by a factor of 5, from 10% to 2%. The number of people visiting to read newspapers or magazines was three times higher in 1991 than in 2000. Borrowing and returning videos, a new function introduced in 2000, accounted for one-fifth of the total reasons for library visits.
Sample Response 5
The bar graph compare the visit rates, in millions, to public libraries in Britain for various purposes in the years 1991 and 2000.
In general, it’s evident that the percentage of visits for borrowing or returning books was the highest in both years. Furthermore, most of these proportions decreased over the 10-year period, primarily due to the introduction of borrowing and returning videos in 2000.
In 1991, there were four categories of visits. Among these, 65% of visitors utilized the library for borrowing and returning purposes, while the remaining three categories collectively represented 35% of the total visits. The interest in reading newspapers or magazines accounted for 15%, while visits for study and obtaining information were both equal at 10%.
In the second scenario, there were five types of visits in 2000. The trend for borrowing or returning books remained the highest, making up 55% of the total. The interest in obtaining information doubled to 20%. However, the rates of people visiting for study and reading newspapers or magazines significantly dropped to 2% and 5%, respectively. A noteworthy addition in 2000 was the introduction of borrowing and returning videos, which accounted for 18% of library visits.
Sample Answer 4
The provided bar graph depicts the activities of individuals at the British Library in the years 1991 and 2000.
In general, the purposes for which people visited the library remained consistent in both years, with borrowing or returning books being the primary reason in both instances. Over the span from 1991 to 2000, the percentage of library visitors declined.
To explore this in more depth, in 1991, a greater number of people engaged in borrowing or returning books compared to 2000. Additionally, their interest in reading newspapers or magazines and acquiring information within the library was more prominent in 1991 but declined by 2000. People allocated more time for studying at the library in 1991, whereas in 2000, there was a noticeable decrease in the time spent studying. In contrast, in 2000, there was a significant decrease in the amount of time people spent studying at the library.
Sample Answer 5
The provided bar graph offers a visual representation of the activities undertaken by patrons at the British Library during the years 1991 and 2000.
In a broader context, it is evident that the underlying motivations for library visitation remained relatively stable in both years, with the predominant objective being borrowing or returning books in each respective year. Nevertheless, a noteworthy decline in the proportion of library visitors occurred over the decade from 1991 to 2000.
Delving into a more comprehensive analysis, it is discernible that, in 1991, a considerable number of individuals engaged in book borrowing and return activities, surpassing the corresponding figures for the year 2000. Furthermore, the proclivity towards perusing newspapers and magazines and seeking informational resources within the library was noticeably more pronounced in 1991 but experienced a reduction by the year 2000. The allocation of time for scholarly pursuits within the library was more pronounced in 1991, whereas in 2000, there was a marked reduction in the time dedicated to such endeavors. Conversely, in 2000, there was a conspicuous reduction in the duration spent by individuals on scholarly pursuits within the library.